MOHD. NAEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10068/2025 · 2025-11-03
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10068 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Sri Ashish Srivatava,Advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4, which is taken on record.
2. Learned AGA raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative and statutory remedy of revision against the impugned order, which could not be disputed by Sri Arpit Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.4.
3. In view of above, the petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative and statutory remedy. November 3, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Mohd. Naeem .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench