RAJESH KUMAR BHATI (PNO-980441363) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13819/2025 · 2025-12-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13819 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging transfer order dated 13.11.2025 as well as relieving order dated 20.11.2025. Further prayer for a direction to opposite parties to continue petitioner in the present place of posting i.e. U.P. 112 Commissionerate, Ghaziabad has also been sought.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner seeks liberty to make a fresh representation in the next annual transfers for his posting in Commissionerate, Ghaziabad.
4. In view of such submission, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation in the next annual transfers for his posting in Commissionerate, Ghaziabad, which may be considered and and decided by authority concerned in accordance with law.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 3, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rajesh Kumar Bhati (Pno-980441363) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench