Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5353 of 2025
Dhiramani Mallick …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC
COROM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 04.03.2025
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-
“(I) Direct/order the Opp. Parties to consider the case of the Petitioner for appointment under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme and in the light of the benefit extended to the Candidates by the DEO Sambalpur vide office order dated 06.01.2023 under R.A. Scheme and thereby quashing the letter dated 17.10.2024 at Annexure-6. (II) Pass such other(s)/direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bonafide interest of justice;”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting her grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.4 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. p. 2p. 2
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Basudev Designation: SR. STENO