Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178916 (ALL)

NANNHE KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

/575/2025 · 2025-11-26

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 575 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, Shri Sumit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the prayer sought in the instant writ petition has already been exhausted. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned AGA could not dispute the said facts. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 26, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sumit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Nannhe Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench