Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178910 (ALL)

SHEKHAR SANDAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

A482/1498/2018 · 2025-10-31

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1498 of 2018 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application even on revised call. However, learned AGA and Sri Prashant Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant are present. 3. Application is accordingly rejected for non-prosecution. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the trial court forthwith. October 31, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Kant Mishra, Sumit Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Prashant Kumar (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Shekhar Sandal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench