APHC010246002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13464/2025 Between: Mookiti Ramanamma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:13464/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly, respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not disposing of the F-line Application vide Application No.FSNV012500635969, dated 22.01.2025 filed through online for conducting survey in survey No.49/4 an extent of Ac.1.20 cents and survey No.49/6 an extent of Ac.0.68 cents of Cheruku Ragappa Naidu Kandriga Village, Thotembedu Mandal, Tirupati District is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, contrary to rules and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to decide the said application for fixing of boundaries and for conducting of survey and pass such other order or orders….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the F-line application dated 22.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner . 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the F-line application dated 22.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the F-line application dated 22.01.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents, more particularly, respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider and dispose of the F-line application dated 22.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties 1 2004 (1) SCC 769 concerned, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 16.06.2025 BSP 09 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.13464 of 2025 16.06.2025 BSP