Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1789 (HP)

BHARAT BHUSHAN v. HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

CMP.M/476/2025 · 2026-03-30

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bharat Bhushan Vs. HDFC ERGO GIC Ltd. & Ors. CMP(M) No.476 of 2025 30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Y. K. Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Respondent No.1 already ex-parte. Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista Advocates, for respondents No.2 to 4. CMP(M) No.476 of 2025 Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed, subject to costs of Rs.10,000/-, which shall be paid to respondents No.2 to 4 before the next date of hearing. Consequently, the delay of one year, eight months and nineteen days in filing the appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No.____ of 2026 (FAOST 3815/25) Appeal be registered. Admit. Let post admission notice be issued to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List on 29.04.2026. CMP No.____ of 2026 (CMPST 3817/25 It be registered. Learned counsel for non-applicants/respondents No.2 to 4 prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply/ seek instructions in the matter. CMP NO.____ of 2026 (CMPST 3818/25) Be registered. The application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant/appellant file file certified copy of the award before the next date of hearing. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge March 30 2026 (V.Himalvi)