Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178879 (ALL)

DHARMENDRA VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/12108/2024 · 2025-10-29

Pankaj Bhatia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12108 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Mr. S.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.182 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Jagatpur, District- Raibareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that a missing person report was lodged, alleging that some unknown person has enticed away the daughter of the informant aged about 16 years. The victim did not support the prosecution story in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the statement of the victim as well as the age of the victim which is around 16 years coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 06.08.2024 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Dharmendra Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey, S.K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A Dharmendra Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 12108 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench