CHANDRA PRAKASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF U.P.PRINCIPAL SEC LOK NIRMAN ANUBHAG LUCKNOW
WRIA/5420/2005 · 2025-10-30
Amitabh Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5420 of 2005 Court No. - 25 HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. The instant writ petition has been filed against the order dated 27.07.2005, whereby the representation of the petitioner was rejected. A bare perusal of the order dated 27.07.2005 indicates that the petitioner was transferred as disciplinary proceedings were pending against him. Today, when the matter was taken up, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. The transfer order is of the year 2005, against which the representation was made and subsequently rejected. The same has lost its efficacy with the passage of time, as the transfer is a recurring administrative action taken by the department on a yearly basis. Hence, at this stage, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 30, 2025 Ashish Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K. Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) Chandra Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P.Principal Sec Lok Nirman Anubhag Lucknow .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench