HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 325 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Akil Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Saurabh Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.319 of 2024, under sections 296, 65(2), 115(2), 351(3) BNS, Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Dubagga, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that husband of the informant caught hold of her own daughter and started showing her certain inappropriate videos and thereafter inserted finger in her private parts. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that a property dispute is going on in between the parties because of which FIR in question was lodged. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the improbability of allegations and refusal of victim to undergo medial examination, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.10.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ratnesh Chandra, Aakil Khan, Ajit Verma, Jamal Ahamad Khan, Mohd. Zishan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pragati Gautam, Saurabh Yadav Mohammad Mateen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohammad Mateen be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 325 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench