Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178855 (ALL)

SYED BILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/5595/2024 · 2025-12-02

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5595 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 129 of 2022, under sections 420, 109 IPC, P.S. Sushant Golf City, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant was granted interim bail subject to the conditions imposed by this Court in paragraph 7 of the order dated 31.5.2024 wherein directions were given to transfer the amounts to the complainants. It is argued that the applicant has not yet been enlarged on bail. 4. In view thereof the interim bail is made final with the same conditions that the applicant shall deposit the amount two months after actual release from prison. In the event of failure it is open for the complaint to move bail cancellation application. 5. The application is disposed of. December 2, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Sharma, Arshad Hafeez Khan, Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Syed Bilal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench