HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7201/2025 1. Bhagwan Singh S/o Shri Gopi, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 2. Ramswaroop Jat S/o Shri Dhannalal Jat, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 3. Hanuman Mali S/o Bhagirath Mali, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 4. Ramlal Jat S/o Jagdish Prasad Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 5. Pradhan Choudhary S/o Ramkaran Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat In- dauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 6. Anil Nayak S/o Shri Mohan Nayak, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 7. Ramal Bairwa S/o Shri Chhitar Bairwa, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Hindola, Gram Panchayat Indauli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, De- partment Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector Cum Chairman, Plpc Tonk District Tonk. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Malpura, District Tonk. 4. Tehsildar Malpura, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND (2 of 2) [CW-7201/2025] Order 12/05/2025 1. After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the peti- tioners submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioners to file a representation before the respondents for redressal of their griev- ances and the authority concerned be also directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, expeditiously as early as possi- ble preferably within a time frame. 2. Considering the aforesaid statement made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioners, the respondents are expected to hear and decide the same expeditiously as early as possible. 3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular manner. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/16