Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17885 (CHH)

HARBANSH SINGH DHILLO (EX WISE PRESIDENT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MAHASAMUND) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2503/2021 · 2025-04-29

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:19374 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2503 of 2021 Harbansh Singh Dhillo (Ex Wise President Municipal Council Mahasamund) S/o Late Ranjeet Singh Dhillo Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Tehsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department Of General Administration , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Log Ayog Through Its Secretary, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt Jyotsana Toppo The Then Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Annapurna Pal The Then Accountant Municipal Council Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shri Shatish Sahu The Then Sub Engineer Municipal Council Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 6 - Shri Anil Jhha The Then Sanitary Inspector Municipal Council Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 7 - Shri Suleman Gwal The Then Lipik (Assistant Revenue Inspector) Municipal Council Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29.04.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that pursuant to the order issued by the Lok Aayog, Chhattisgarh, departmental enquiry was initiated against the respondent No.3 to 7 and penalty of stoppage of two increments with non-cumulative effect has been taken against them. 2) At this stage, Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 3) Taking into consideration the submission made by the counsel appearing for the respective parties, this writ petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM