Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178843 (ALL)

MOHD.MUSTKEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/1186/2025 · 2025-11-26

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1186 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents who has provided a copy of the written instructions for perusal of the Court which is taken on record indicates that there are no constructions activities going on the plot concerned. There were certain temporary arrangements made for some religious purpose which after its conclusion has been restored to its original position. In light of the aforesaid, nothing survives in the present petition which is accordingly dismissed. November 26, 2025 Asheesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Sachan, Priyanshu Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Mohd.Mustkeem .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench