Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. thru Principal Sec. Home Deptt.
/11249/2025 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178841 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11249 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 119 of 2025, under sections 80(2), 85 BNS, Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P,S. Raniganj, District Pratapgarh.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of informant was married to applicant in the year 2021. Subsequently entire matrimonial family used to harass her for dowry and ultimately killed her. Post mortem report on record indicates that the cause of death could not be ascertained. Even in the viscera report no poison was found. The applicant is the husband.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the post mortem report and viscera analysis no material exist to form a view that the death in question was not a natural death, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.6.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ranjeet Kumar Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjeet Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru Principal Sec. Home Deptt. .....Opposite Party(s)
following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11249 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench