NITIN DNYANESHWAR YEDKE v. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
CA/5717/2024 · 2025-01-09
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17883 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17883 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} 915 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5717 OF 2024 IN FAST/14137/2024 NITIN DNYANESHWAR YEDKE ….Applicant VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dargad Swapnil Sunilkumar
CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 9TH JANUARY, 2025.
P.C. :- By this application, the applicant seeks to condone the delay of 324 days caused in filing appeal. The applicant is original claimant in M.A.C.P. No. 273 of 2009. His claim has been partly allowed. Present appeal is filed seeking enhancement of compensation. Delay is caused in filing appeal.
2. In spite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent.
3. It is contended in the application that the claimant has suffered multiple injuries in the accident. The claimant was short of funds to file appeal and somehow arranged for funds. In the process, 2025:BHC-AUG:889
{2} 915 sr.no..odt delay has been caused.
4. Considering submissions advanced and reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections.
[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J]
grt/-