HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10275 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the co-accused Rahul Mandal who was assigned the similar role has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2025 passed in criminal misc. bail application No. 9775 of 2025. Learned counsel for the applicants seeks parity with the order of the co-accused. It is further submitted that the applicants are languishing in jail since 28.06.2025. He has explained criminal history of seven cases in paragraph seven of the bail application. There is no possibility of the applicants of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicants are enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that it is a case of parity. On due consideration to the fact that co-accused Rahul Mandal who was assigned the similar role has been enlarged on bail, coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.06.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bunty Mandal And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Let the applicants Bunty Mandal and Chhotu Mahto involved in Case Crime No. 0334 of 2025, under Sections- 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(2) B.N.S. and Section 66-C, 66-D IT Act, Police Station-Kotwali Ayodhya, District-Ayodhya. be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A I.P.C. (now 269 BNS) (vi) In case the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now 209 BNS). The application is allowed accordingly. November 6, 2025/R.C. BAIL No. 10275 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench