SMT. SHRADDHA @ MUNNI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/10777/2025 · 2025-12-18
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10777 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the impugned Charge Sheet No. 01 dated 04.10.2019 and order of cognizance and summoning dated 18.02.2020 passed in Case No. 1799 of 2020 and
order dated 30.06.2025 for issuance of Bailable Warrant dated 30.06.2025 together with entire proceedings arising out of F.I.R. No. 0261 of 2019 lodged on 25.08.2019 under Section 504 and 506 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Kotwali Bhinga, District Shravasti."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.10 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, Abhishek Shukla, Bharat Lal Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Shraddha @ Munni And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the
learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10777 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench