APHC010246242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.12878/2025 BETWEEN: 1. ALLAMPALLI ABBAI, S/o. LATE A.DHARMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/o.1-169, DURGAM CENTER, DURGAM GUDI, THIMMAPURAM VILLAGE, KAKINADA MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT) 2. PENDEM HYMA VATHI, W/o. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O 20-21-3, SIDDANTHIGARI VEEDHI, SAMBASIVA RAO PETA, TUMMALAAVA, RAJAHMUNDRY, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT). 3. BEERA RANI, W/o. GANGABBAI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/o.1-90, SC PETA, KOVVURU, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. BEEDELA HEMALATHA, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/o.2-188, SC PETA, PULIMERU VILLAGE, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT). 5. ALLAMPALLI RAJU, S/o. A.ABBAI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/o.1-168, RAMALAYAM STREET, THIMMAPURAM VILLAGE, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT). 6. ALLAMPALLI SUDHAKAR, S/o. A.ABBAI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/o. 1-168/A, RAMALAYAM STREET, THIMMAPURAM VILLAGE, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA DIVISION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KAKINADA MANDAL, KAKINADA DIVISION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the representations dated 06.03.2025 and 07.04.2025 made by the petitioners and in not restoring the land in R.S. No. 186/7 to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cent situated at Thimmapuram Village, Kakinada Mandal, or in the alternative, in not assigning suitable land under the landless poor scheme to the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the said representations, conduct an appropriate enquiry into the matter, and restore the land in question to the petitioners or assign suitable land in accordance with the landless poor scheme and prevailing laws and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri P. Varun Kumar, learned counsel represented the learned counsel for the petitioner on record and sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition and endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2025 Harin 4 119 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 12878 OF 2025 Date: 17-09-2025 Harin