HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5412 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view thereof, since the final report has already been submitted, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed. November 7, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Pandey, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Archana Jaysawal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench