KAMAL PANDEY ALIAS KAMAL KISHOR PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PAKUR
B.A./5917/2025 · 2025-07-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:19423] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5917 of 2025
Kamal Pandey @ Kamal Kishor Pandey, aged about 21 years, Son of Kailash Kumar Pandey, Resident of Village Shyam Nagar, P.O. Pakur, P.S. - Pakur (Town), District -Pakur, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through Superintendent of Police, Pakur, having its office at Pakur, P.O. - Pakur, P.S. - Pakur (Town), District - Pakur, Jharkhand.
2. Officer-In-Charge, Pakur Town Police Station, P.O. -Pakur, P.S. Pakur (Town), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
… Opp. parties
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Mishra , Adv. For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey , Addl. PP.
02 / 16.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 146 of 2025 instituted under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 132, 121 (1), 221, 324 (4), 352, 351 (2) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner entered the police station and made ruckus and abused and manhandled the police personnel. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 19 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 15.05.2025 , as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to
co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 146 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-