Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178788 (ALL)

DEENA NATH PANDEY v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION, U.P. CIVIL SECTT LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/824/2022 · 2025-10-29

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 824 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of "Priority Cases". 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the State- respondents. 4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 29, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjeet Singh, Babu Ram Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Deena Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Irrigation, U.P. Civil Sectt Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench