SMT. SEEMA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/12795/2025 · 2025-11-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178772 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178772 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12795 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4, 5 & 6, Mr. G.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record.
Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"i) Issue writ order in nature of mandamus commanding to the concerned opposite parties that they consider the case of petitioner and pay the upgraded salary and arrears thereof to the petitioner according to the order dated 14.02.2022 of opposite party No.4 and order dated 29.11.2024 of opposite party No.5 within reasonable time as early as possible, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid.
Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Uday Veer Singh Smt. Seema Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
no.4/District Basic Education Officer, District Gonda within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of two months. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12795 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench