HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12631 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard Sri Rakesh Chaudhary, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Ayush Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 290 of 2025 under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) BNS, & 3, 10 U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998, P.S.-Bijnor, District- Lucknow. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 05.10.2025, the applicant was apprehended while impersonating the co-accused, Gaurav Aditya, and appearing in the IBPS CPR–CSA Examination on his behalf on the basis of a forged admit card, at B.R. Online Services (Bhonwal Institute of Engineering), Bijnor Road, near the CRPF Camp, Lucknow. It is submitted that the applicant has been maliciously implicated in the case and that the real beneficiary is someone else. The applicant having no criminal antecedents has been languishing in jail since 05.10.2025. The co- accused namely Bhagirath Sharma @ Chandan, Sudhanshu Kumar, Dhananjay Kumar Saurav, and Rakesh Kumar, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders contained in Annexure Nos. 10 to 12 to the bail application, collectively. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ayush Chaudhary, Rajni Kant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Abhishek Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record. On due consideration of the facts that applicant having no criminal antecedents has been languishing in jail since 05.10.2025, undertaking given by the applicant to cooperate in the investigation, bail orders of the co- accused named above, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Abhishek Kumar involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 15, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12631 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench