ROHIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/13752/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13752 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Liberty is granted to petitioner to implead the Public Information Officer, U.P. Police Recruitment & Promotion Board, Lucknow as opposite party no.4 during the course of the day. Petitioner is granted liberty to amend the prayer clause to make it more specific, during course of the day.
3. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide marks obtained by petitioner in the examinations for recruitment on the post of Constable in Civil Police held on 23.12.2023.
4. It appears that despite such a request being made on 14.10.2025, the details have not yet been provided to petitioner.
5. In view thereof, opposite parties are directed to inform petitioner with regard to marks obtained by him in aforesaid examination expeditiously within a period of two weeks from submission of a certified copy of this order before authority concerned.
6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Sachan, Abhishek Shukla, Brijesh Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rohit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench