Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17873 (AP)

N SURESH v. GUNUPURU RAMARAO

WA/582/2025 · 2025-07-28

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010246482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 582 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 29.04.2025 in lA No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No. 10618 of 2025 on the file of High Court. Between: N. Suresh, S/o Neelakantam, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Hydrologist, O/o Deputy Director, Ground Water and Water Audit Department, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh Assistant ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.4 (Impleaded as R4 vide Order dated 29.04.2025 in lA No.2 of 2025 in W.P.No.10618 of 2025) AND 1. Gunupuru Ramarao, S/o Gunupuru Krishna Rao, Aged about 32 years Occ Assistant Hydrogeologist, Srikakulam District. R/o 147, Komanapalli Colony, Soda, ... RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Water Block 2, Velagapudi, Resources Department, Secretariat Buildings Guntur District. % 3. The Director, Ground Water and Water Audit Department, Namburi Gopala Rao Street, Vysya Bhavah, 4' Vijayawada, NTR District. 4. M. John Satya Raju, S/o. M. James, Aged about 61 Years, Occupation; Director, Ground Water and Water Audit Department, Vysya Bhavan, Namboorivari Veedhi, Hanumanpet, Near Railway Station, beside Government Hospital, Vijayawada-520003, NTR District Floor, Hanuman Pet, ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT Nos.1 to 3 lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of interim order dated 29.04.2025 passed in IA.No.1 of 2025 in WP.No.10618 of 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI N. ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V. VENUGOPAL RAO COUNSEL FOR SRI V. VENKATASUBBAIAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3:GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD Counsel for the Respondent No.4:-- The Court made the following: JUDGMENT SENIOR V-'"- THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.582 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) This appeal is filed against the order dated 29.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2025, wherein the respondents therein are directed to consider the case of persons working as Assistant Hydrogeologists, including that of petitioner, for promotion in the existing vacancies of Assistant Director (Hydrogeoiogist) in terms of Memo No.2194182/Ser.lll/2023, dated 08.12.2023, if they are otherwise found eligible and falling under the zone of consideration and since the tenure of DPC is to expire, the Court further directed that the said exercise shall be undertaken and completed before the said period. It appears that the appellant herein is subsequently impleaded in W.P.No.10618 of 2025 as one of the respondents. He filed this appeal against the interim order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in the said writ petition. 2. During the course of hearing of the Writ Appeal, Sri Venu Gopala Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and learned Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, on instructions would submit that interim order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.10618 of 2025 has been complied with and promotions are affected. They also placed a copy 3. 'r 2 of the proceedings dated 25.06.2025. On perusal of the same, it appears that the respondent No.1 herein is temporarily promoted as Assistant Director (Hydrogeology) and directed him to join in the promoted post immediately and to intimate the date of joining to the concerned. 1 In view of the above factual position, as the Writ Appeal is filed 4. against the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge has already been complied with and the main Writ Petition is pending for consideration before the learned Single Judge, as such, in our considered view, nothing survives in the present Writ Appeal for further adjudication. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. 5. However, it is open to the appellant to make request before the learned Single Judge to take up the Writ Petition for hearing at an earlierdate along with the connected Writ Petition. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri N. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri V. Venkatasubbaiah, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCS to GP for Irrigation and CAD, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies. 1. 2. 3. 4. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:29/07/2025 JUDGMENT WA No.582 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS