Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178726 (ALL)

AKSHAIBAR NATH KANAUJIYA and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

/1262/2020 · 2025-12-04

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1262 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pertains to the year 2020. 3. It appears that on the previous occasions, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants. Today also when the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application, nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. No one has appeared on behalf of the opposite party no.2. 4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present. 5. The application appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time, hence, dismissed. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 4, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Mehrotra, Sooraj Rai, Sudheer Kumar Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Akshaibar Nath Kanaujiya And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench