Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178722 (MAD)

A.JIVENDIRAN v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP/27917/2025 · 2025-12-16

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.27917 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.12.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.27917 of 2025 A.Jivendiran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District – 604 407. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Vandavasi, Villupuram District – 604 408. 3.Saminathan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 08.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner to rectify the mistake in the FMB sketch and UDR in respect of the property in New No.60/23 (Old Survey No.60/1A) of Vangaram Village, Vandavasi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District as per the registered sale deeds dated 18.04.1960 and 22.12.1969. Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27917 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.K.Amirthalingam [R3] ***** ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to rectifiy the alleged mistake in the FMB sketch and UDR for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the registered sale deeds dated 18.04.1960 and 22.12.1969 referred to in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The 3rd respondent is the contesting respondent and he is represented by learned counsel. Till date, the respective respondents have not been filed by their counter. 3. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation, dated 08.05.2025 seeking rectification of the alleged mistake in the FMB sketch and UDR, is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent as well as any other party, whom the 1st respondent deems fit, within a Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27917 of 2025 time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 08.05.2025 seeking rectification of the alleged mistake in the FMB sketch and UDR in respect of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the registered sale deeds, dated 18.04.1960 and 22.12.1969 relied upon by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent as well as any other party whom the 1st respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 16.12.2025 Index : Yes / No (2/4) Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.27917 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. sp To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District – 604 407. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Vandavasi, Villupuram District – 604 408. W.P.No.27917 of 2025 16.12.2025 (2/4) Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis