Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178702 (ALL)

JAI SHANKAR SHUKLA @ GOPAL v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/3606/2025 · 2025-11-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3606 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.374 of 2024, under Sections 333, 103(1) of BNS, Police Station Dubagga, District Lucknow. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that an information was received that the father of the informant was a bad state and was beaten by some unknown person in the home. Subsequently, the father of the informant was taken to the trauma center, where he died. The applicant is the son of the deceased and was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, based upon the statement of the mother and the sister of the applicant that he was seen rushing to the home where the incident taken place and after washing his cloths, left the home. Subsequently, based upon the confessional statement, the applicant arrested for the offence in question. The applicant admitted that he has committed the offence as he was not satisfied with the partition of the property. 5. The Counsel for the applicant argues that the mother and sister of the applicant filed affidavits wherein they denied their earlier statement given before the police authority. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Naresh Yadav, Vineet Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jai Shankar Shukla @ Gopal .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 7. Considering the statement of the mother and the sister of the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 06.11.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . 8. Let the applicant Jai Shankar Shukla @ Gopal be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 3606 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench