HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13298 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for awarding one notional increment to the petitioner in terms of Government Order dated 12.06.2024. 3. It is submitted that petitioner's case is covered by judgment rendered in the case of Parmatma Prasad Pandey v. State of U.P. and others, Writ Petition No. 18375 (SS) of 2020. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Additional Director, Treasury and Pension, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya, who shall consider and decide the same, in light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 20, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Shanker Tewari, Ajay Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ramabhilash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Secondary Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench