1 2025:CGHC:18291 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 45 of 2024 1. Dilip Das, S/o Mahettar Das, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Rano, Post Parpodi, Tahsil Devkar, District Bemetara (C.G.). 2. Smt. Dashreet Das, W/o Dildaar Das, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Rano, Post Parpodi, Tahsil Devkar, District Bemetara (C.G.). 3. Santu, S/o Ganesh Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Rano, Post Parpodi, Tahsil Devkar, District Bemetara (C.G.). 4. Bishal, S/o Ghasiya Sahu, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Rano, Post Parpodi, Tahsil Devkar, District Bemetara (C.G.). ... Appellants/Plaintiffs versus 1. Basant Kumari Gupta, W/o Murlidhar Gupta, Aged About 80 Years, R/o House No.237, Old Post Office Lane, Ward No.41, Kasaridih, Kelabadi, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.). 2. Yogeshwar Sonkar, S/o Ballram Sonkar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No.196, Bajrang Chowk, Ward No.2, Kumhari, Tahsil Damdha, District Durg (C.G.). 3. Smt. Pushpa Sonkar, W/o Rajeshwar Sonkar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No.475, Ganesh Chowk, Ward No.5, Kumhari, Tahsil Damdha, District Durg (C.G.). 4. Prahlad, S/o Jogi Verma, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Village Salhekala, Post Udaipur, Tahsil Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 5. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.). ... Respondents/Defendants (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Viprasen Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents No.2, 3 & 4 : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.5 : Mr. Santosh Soni, G.A. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 23/04/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that instant miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the appellants challenging the Order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the District Judge Bemetara (C.G.) in Civil Suit No.5- A/2023, whereby, the application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC filed by the appellants/plaintiffs was dismissed. She further submits that aforesaid civil suit has been decided by the trial Court, therefore, the matter has become infructuous. 3. In view of above, instant miscellaneous appeal is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge