HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10280 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Upon perusal of the documents, it is clear that the writ petition is against private respondents being respondent nos. 4 and 5 and the cause of action is against the actions being taken by the private respondents. 3. We are of the view that this writ petition is not maintainable as the relief as sought is basically against the private respondents. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/authority for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law. November 3, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Shahid Akhtar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mohammad Mukeem .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench