Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178668 (ALL)

NEETA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/11550/2025 · 2025-11-27

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11550 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Kishun Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Alok Srivastava, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Ajai Kumar Rai, the learned counsel for Deen Dayal Upadhyay, Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur (opposite parties no.2 to 4) an perused the records. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutuion of India the petitioner has sought issuance of duplicate marksheet. The petitioner has given an application in this regard on 20.02.2023 and has paid the requisite fee. 3. Sri Ajai Kumar Rai, the learned counsel for the university has stated that the university will take appropriate action in this regard within a period of two weeks. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of by observing that the petitioner may submit copy of application, fee receipt and a copy of this order before the opposite party no.4 along with fresh representation and the opposite party no.4 shall take appropriate action thereon within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of same. November 27, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kishun Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajai Kumar Rai (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Neeta Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench