IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2809 of 2017 ----- 1.Sri Ramswaroop Gope, S/o Sri Chotu Gope 2.Sri Sudarshan Ji, S/o Late Shambhu Prasad 3.Sri Prasadi Dangi, S/o Amrit Mahto 4.Shivshankar Pandey, S/o Dhanushdhari Pandey 5.Nisha Taramani Minz, S/o Aasavant Minz 6.Santosh Kumar, S/o Sri Basudev Modi 7.Yogendra Ram, S/o Late Rohani Ram 8.Santosh Kumar Mehta, S/o Satyanarayan Prasad Mehta 9.Santosh Kumar Verma, S/o Ramsevak Verma 10.Kaleshwar Yadav, S/o Moti Mahto 11.Saroj Prasad, S/o Late Vishun Prajapati 12.Rakesh Kumar Sinha, S/o Sudhir Kumar Sinha 13.Naresh Nayak, S/o Late Ratan Sav 14.Kali Charan, S/o Saryu Rana 15.Anup Kumar Ravi, S/o Khemlal Ram 16.Vijay Ravi Das, S/o Late Vanshi Ram 17.Umesh Kumar Paswan, S/o Late Shyamlal Ram 18.Vishwanath Ojha, S/o Late Ram Kumar Ojha 19.Ugan Shao, S/o Late Chaman Shao 20.Sunil Kumar, S/o Sri Ganesh Rajak 21.Pradeep Kumar Nayak, S/o Sri Basudev Shao 22.Sunil Kumar, S/o Sri Teklal Ram 23.Muneshwar Gope, S/o Sri Bhuli Gope 24.Mahesh Prasad Kushwaha, S/o Sri Dahan Mehto 25.Mohd. Sadique Akhtar, S/o Abdul Jalil Kasmi 26.Ramesh Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Chand Singh 27.Smt. Bina Madhuri Lugun, S/o S.F. Lugun 28.Sri Sanjeev Kumar Kujur, S/o Late John Kujur 29.Mansur Alam, S/o Abdul Majid 30.Shashi Kant, S/o Sri Dhaneshwar Ram 31.Kunjal Prasad, S/o Sri. Jhullu Shao 32.Surendra Kumar, S/o Sri Kameshwar Ram 33.Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav, S/o Sri Rewa Mehto 34.Abdul Nasim, S/o Mohd. Samim 35.Pawan Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Prem Kumar Singh ------ Petitioner(s) Versus 1.State of Jharkhand 2.The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand 3.The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh ------ Respondent(s) …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. S.C.-II Ms. Nirupama, AC to Sr. S.C.-II …...... 11 / 12.02.2025: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. It is made clear that if the petitioners are found eligible to appear in the limited departmental examination for the purpose of promotion, their case will be considered and they should be allowed to appear in the examination. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S.