Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17864 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI TOLARAM v. NAVNEET SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI YOGESH SHARMA @ KIKKURAM

CW/9257/2025 · 2025-09-20

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38725] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9257/2025 1. Ashok Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Tolaram, Resident Of Plot No. 232, Vasudev Marg, Nemisagar Colony, Queens Road, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Kiran Sharma Wife Of Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. 232, Vasudev Marg, Nemisagar Colony, Queens Road, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Karan Sharma Son Of Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. 232, Vasudev Marg, Nemisagar Colony, Queens Road, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Navneet Sharma Son Of Late Shri Yogesh Sharma @ Kikkuram, Resident Of Plot No. 9-10, Teerath Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur 2. Praveen Sharma Son Of Late Shri Yogesh Sharma @ Kikkuram, Resident Of Plot No. 9-10, Teerath Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur 3. Smt. Rajni Devi Wife Of Late Shri Yogesh Sharma @ Kikkuram, Resident Of Plot No. 9-10, Teerath Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur 4. Usha Devi Wife Of Shri Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Resident Of E-9, Roop Vihar Colony, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur 5. Shakutala Devi Wife Of Shri Gauri Shankar, Resident Of Rani Sati Road, Vishwakarma Marg, Jhunjhunu. 6. Shri Sunderji, Resident Of Sahaboo Ke Kuwa Ke Pas, Near Sbbj Bank, Jhunjhunu (Husband Of Late Munni Devi @ Madhu) 7. Smt. Santosh Devi Wife Of Shri Ratanlal Ji Jangid, Resident Of H-1, Indra Nagar, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. 8. Assistant Engineer (B-V), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Nirman Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:38725] (2 of 2) [CW-9257/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anita Aggarwal, Adv.with Mr. Laxmi Kant Tailor, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/09/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. However, it is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner on account of withdrawal of this petition. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /7