SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
/14182/2025 · 2025-12-09
Manish Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178629 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178629 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14182 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opposite parties to make only feeding of the name of the petitioner on the basis of time period he had worked with them and give benefit of order of Writ No.12261 of 2021 [S/S] [Kapil Dev Tiwari versus State of U.P. and others], and petitioner may provide duty SO that petitioner could survive his family life."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Deputy Director, Youth Welfare and Prantiya Rakshak Dal, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided in the light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Singh, Mohammad Kaif Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench