HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9112 of 2025 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Sri Suresh Kumar Mishra, Advocate has put in appearance and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite parties no. 2, the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and learned counsel appearing for opposite parties no. 2 as well as perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the charge-sheet dated 06.04.2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 54/2023, Under Sections 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Alambagh, District Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 18.07.2023 passed by the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 3rd, Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 77655 of 2023: State Vs. Jagvir Singh including the entire proceedings thereof. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicants. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing. Thereafter, the applicants filed an Application U/s 482 No. 6444 of 2025 wherein this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 had directed the court below to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the compromise deed was verified on 21.08.2025. He submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Imran Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Suresh Kumar Mishra Jagvir Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Learned counsel appearing for opposite parties nos. 2 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite parties nos. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 02.08.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 21.08.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings against the applicants. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 02.08.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466. Resultantly, the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 77655 of 2023: State Vs. Jagvir Singh, arising out of Case Crime No. 54/2023, Under Sections 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Alambagh, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. October 30, 2025 Arvind A482 No. 9112 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench