DEEN DAYAL PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/8048/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178617 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178617 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8048 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 51 of 2025, under Section 103(1) of BNS, P.S. Aaspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, it is alleged that the brother of the informant was beaten up by the applicant and thereafter he was taken on Ambulance and because of the injuries sustained, he died. In the light of the said allegations, counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the report placed before the Police authorities on telephone no. 112, it was alleged that two persons had a fight because of being under the state of intoxication. He further argues that the cause of death is ante mortem lung injury and the injuries shown in the post mortem are abrasion on the face, contused swelling on the chest, lacerated wound on the elbow joint and contused swelling on the thigh. It is further argued that even in terms of the statement recorded, the dispute had occurred on account of some petty dispute in between them and allegedly in the state of intoxication. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the cause for the alleged offence and there is no premeditative intent at the instance of the applicant, the applicant who is in jail since 27.02.2025 and has two criminal history which has been explained, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anamika Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajay Vikram Deen Dayal Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6.
Let the applicant Deen Dayal Pandey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 Anurag BAIL No. 8048 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench