RAM NARESH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.KRISHI VIPRAN LUCKNOW and ORS
WRIA/10072/2020 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178616 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178616 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10072 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Raj, Rishabh Raj Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Lalji Yadav, Naresh Chandra Mehrotra, Rajesh Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Naresh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Krishi Vipran Lucknow And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench