HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 26656 of 2019 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Singh Nis, learned counsel for respondent(s) and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite party No. 3 and 4 to pay difference of arrears of salary along with appropriate interest during the suspension period i.e. 30.05.2015 to 02.11.2016 for the post of Assistant Teacher in the collage in question. to II). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties consider and decide representation of petitioner as contained as Annexure No. 7 to this writ petition. III). Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. IV). Allow the writ petition with cost." It is contended by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the arrears of salary with payable interest from the date of 30.05.2015 to 02.11.2016, has not been paid as yet. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sant Bux Singh, Amanur Rahman, Ashma Izzat, Iqbal Ahmad, Jai Shiva Pratap, Nawab Ahmad Khan, Prabhat Kumar Upadhyay, Rayees Ahmad Khan, Syed Monis Husain Kazmi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chandra Bhushan Singh Nis, Rishabh Tripathi Ataullah Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Madhyamik Edu. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, Balrampur is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 26656 of 2019 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench