IN TH 110 Simranjee Sh. Tejvir Govt. of P Bhawan, C CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B “Simranjit observed as COCP-3794-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3794 o Date of decision anjeet Singh alias Simranjit Singh Versus ejvir Singh, Additional Chief Secre t. of Punjab, Deptt. of Local Govern an, Chandigarh and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG for respondents No.1 to 3. Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 15.10.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CW ranjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and rved as under :- “…This Court is not co regards the culpability of Municipal Corporat but leaves it to all the C Corporation in State o inquiry as expeditiously 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3794 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-13.01.2026 ingh …..Petitioner Secretary/Principal Secretary, overnment, Punjab Municipal …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA i, AAG Punjab ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- CWP-PIL-110-2019 titled as b and another”, whereby it was ot coming to any conclusion as ility or mis-conduct on the part oration officers and employees he Commissioners of Municipal te of Punjab to undertake an usly as possible and find out as VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document As well as time has b submission as has been Municipal and officer been issue Planner, A Inspector o are underw proceeding passed by t CWP-PIL violation o dated 25.4. behalf of petition. E petitioner. COCP-3794-2025 (O & M) to who were the errin who had permitted t sanction during their same as within a perio compliance report lates ell as the interim order dated 25.4.202 has been extended for completion o ission of compliance report by 30.6.20 It is pointed out by learned co been stated in para 6 of the present c icipal Corporation has taken action ag officers and 18 show cause notices an issued to various employees at the ner, Assistant Town Planner, Senior T ector of the Municipal Corporations a underway and further time is sough eedings. This fact has been recorded i ed by the Division Bench of this Court PIL-110-2019. It is submitted tha tion of the orders dated 15.10.2024 25.4.2024 (Annexure P-3). Heard. Order sheets shows that none lf of petitioner since the inception ion. Even today none has put in ioner. 2 erring officers and employees, ed the violation of building heir tenure and conclude the period of two months and file latest by 31.01.2025….”. .4.2024 (Annexure P-3) whereby tion of enquiry proceedings and 30.6.2025. rned counsel for respondents that esent contempt petition itself, the tion against the erring employees ices and three charge-sheets have at the level of Municipal Town nior Town Planner and Building tions and enquiries in this regard sought to conclude the enquiry rded in the order dated 25.4.2025 Court in CM-83-CWPIL-2025 in ed that accordingly there is no .2024 (Annexure P-1) and order t none has put in appearance on eption of the present contempt ut in appearance on behalf of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document contempt p respondent January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3794-2025 (O & M) In view of the facts as ack empt petition itself and as pointed out ndents, the present contempt petition s Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 13, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 as acknowledged in the present ed out by learned counsel for the tition stands disposed of. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document