Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17859 (RAJ)

JEETU @ JITENDRA S/O SH. KEDAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/883/2025 · 2025-05-05

Ashok Kumar Jain

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18761] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc 2nd (Interim) Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 883/2025 in S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2197/2023 Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Sh. Kedar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Barigha, P.s. Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (Presently In Central Jail At Bharatpur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/05/2025 1. The matter is listed for interim SOS application No. 883/2025 on the ground that the father (Shri Kedar) of applicant-accused Jeetu @ Jitendra has expired on 24.04.2025 and as per report submitted by Police Station, Ucchain, District Bharatpur last rites were already performed by other family members and relatives. 2. Learned counsel for applicant submits this interim bail is preferred due to unfortunate demise of father of applicant- appellant-Jeetu. He further submits that appellant’s father has left his family in a state of grief and shock, so he need to perform the death rites and provide emotional support to his family during this difficult time. [2025:RJ-JP:18761] (2 of 3) [SOSA-883/2025] 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the report received from Police Station Ucchain, District Bharatpur. 4. Applicant-accused Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Sh. Kedar was convicted by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act, Cases) No.1 Bharatpur on 17.07.2023 in Sessions Case No.51/2019 under Sections 363 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act. 5. Having considered the fact of death of father of applicant- accused, it is appropriate to allow interim bail for a period of three days from 05.05.2025 to 07.05.2025. Thus, the interim SOS application No. 883/2025 is allowed without considering the merits of the case only on ground of death of father for three days. 6. Considering each and every aspect of the matter, looking to reasons as mentioned in the application, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that the interim application for suspension of sentence of appellant- Jeetu @ Jitendra is allowed for a period of three days provided that he would execute a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two sound sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge subject to the conditions indicated below:- (i) After release of appellant on bail, he will not indulge in any criminal activity and if it is found that he is involved in any criminal activity, the order shall be recalled. (ii) During period of interim bail, applicant will not leave jurisdiction of District Bharatpur. (iii) That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed [2025:RJ-JP:18761] (3 of 3) [SOSA-883/2025] address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. (iv) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), he will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. (v) That the applicant will not contact victim or any of the prosecution witnesses or their family. (vi) After availing period of first three days from 05.05.2025 to 07.05.2025, the applicant-accused will surrender before the Jail Authorities before 11.00 AM on 08.05.2025 and the report of surrender will be sent to the Trial Court. 7. The Trial Court is directed to send both the reports of surrender along with bail bonds to this Court. 8. Misc. application stands disposed of. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order immediately to the concerned Court by e-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /34