PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. HOME SECY. ANNEXE BHAWAN LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/947/2025 · 2025-11-11
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178588 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178588 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 947 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. Heard Mr. Gaurav Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the records. Present Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to pass appropriate directions, directing the learned ACJM (CBI), A.P. Lucknow regarding expeditious disposal of criminal case no.53672 of 2022 (State vs. Anupama Sondhi) pertaining to case crime no.0482 of 2020, under Sections - 279, 304 A IPC, police station - Mahanagar, Lucknow within a short stipulated time frame. In the instant matter the FIR was lodged on 24.11.2020 under sections - 304 - A, 279 IPC & thereafter charge sheet was filed. At present, as said by the
learned counsel for the applicant, that only three witnesses of fact have been examined the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the applicant gets corroborated by the Annexure - 3 appended to the present petition (page 24- 27.) It has further been argued that till 25.8.2025 no other witnesses have been examined. That there are 17 witnesses in all who have to be examined. It has further been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in the said incident the young daughter of the applicant has died which has caused the mental agony to the applicant. The applicant must get speedy justice, so that the faith and honour to the law and Constitution be continued to establish. Looking to the facts of the case and the argument rendered by the learned counsel for the applicant, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to pass an order to direct the learned trial court to decide the matter in question Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Sinha, Akshat Sinha, Gaurav Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. Annexe Bhawan Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
as expeditiously as possible, within six months from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before the court below. It is further directed not to pass any adjournment in a routine manner. With these directions the instant criminal miscellaneous application is
disposed of finally. November 11, 2025 mks A483 No. 947 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench