Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178567 (MAD)

I MOHAMMED SABEER v. DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 2

WP/49734/2025 · 2025-12-19

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 49734 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 49734 of 2025 & WMP Nos.55613 & 55616 of 2025 1. I Mohammed Sabeer, MIG-20/A, Ground Floor, Bagalur Road, Avalapalli Hudco Hosur, Krishnagiri-635109 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy State Tax Officer - 2 (also Known as Commercial Tax Officer), Hosur North -II, Krishnagiri Respondent(s) PRAYER This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in FORM GST DRC-07 with Reference No.ZD330324009681R dated 02.03.2024 along with detailed order in GST No. 33AFLPM0643P2Z4 / 2022-23 dated 02.03.2024 for the assessment period 2022-23, and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.N.Chandrasekar For Respondent: Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, GA 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49734 of 2025 ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order bearing Reference No.ZD330324009681R dated 02.03.2024 along with detailed order in GST No. 33AFLPM0643P2Z4 / 2022-23 dated 02.03.2024 of the respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.10.2023 wherein the petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 02.03.2024. 4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned order has already expired. The present writ petition has been filed only on 08.12.2025. 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49734 of 2025 5. Under similar circumstances, orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case. 6. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Within such time, the petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC- 01 dated 14.10.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 02.03.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 14.10.2023. 8. In case the petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such pre-deposit. Subject to the petitioner complying with the above 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49734 of 2025 stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated. 9. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 10. In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this writ petition was dismissed in limine today. 11. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the respondent shall give due notice to the petitioner. 12. This Writ Petition stands disposed of, with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 19-12-2025 dn Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49734 of 2025 To 1.Deputy State Tax Officer - 2 (also Known As Commercial Tax Officer), Hosur North -II, Krishnagiri. 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49734 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. dn WP No. 49734 of 2025 19-12-2025 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis