OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/10466/2024 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10466 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. None has appeared on behalf of the applicant even in the revised list.
2. It has been informed that the trial has concluded and the application has rendered infructuous.
3. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. November 28, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailender Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Om Prakash .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench