JAGAT NARAIN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1675/2025 · 2025-11-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1675 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.335 of 2025 under sections 115(2), 352, 333, 125, 351(3), 109, 191(2) BNS, P.S. Wazirganj, district Gonda. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. Cross first information reports have been registered by both sides. Both sides have sustained injuries. There is general allegation in the prosecution case against four persons of assaulting the wife of the complainant as well as other two ladies and two more persons which is highly improbable. No case under section 109 BNS is made out. 4.Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel and submits that the admitted case of the accused applicant is that both the parties have suffered injuries. It is not a case of false implication. The injury report corroborates the prosecution version. 5.I have considered the submission and perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that in this case, during investigation, name of the co- accused Arun Singh came into light and on the basis of the injury report and the statement of the injured, sections 109, 191(2) BNS appear to have been added. The injured Amita Singh has suffered a lacerated wound Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jagat Narain Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
on left side forehead. The investigation is still going on. 6.In view of the submission advanced, perusal of the record as well as the injury report of Amita Singh, her statement as also the statement of the complainant, it cannot be said that it is a case of false implication. The offence under section 109 BNS is punishable with life imprisonment. 7.No case for anticipatory bail is made out. The application is dismissed. November 11, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1675 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench