Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010246902019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11091/2019 Between: Mohammed Yakhud ...PETITIONER AND The A P State Waqf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M MEHDI HUSSAIN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN
2. M R S SRINIVAS
::2::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO:11091 of 2019
This Court made the following
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
02.01.2025 krk
::3::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.11091 of 2019 02nd January, 2025
krk
182