HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7032 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Jay Shankar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Anupam Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that because of certain defects that have crept in the petition, the petitioners do not want to press the present petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. The prayer made is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopies of the same on record. December 5, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Bajpai, Puneet Kumar Srivastava, Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ajay Kumar Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) Ramawati And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench