SHIV RAM SINGH YADAV (PNO-842356206) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME) U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14024/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14024 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to revise petitioner's salary to Rs.66,100/- per month in parity with one Sub Inspector, Surjan Singh, who is said to be petitioner's batchmate.
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 4 i.e. Police Commissioner (Head Quarter)Mahanagar, Commissionerate, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 4, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mewa Ram Satyarthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shiv Ram Singh Yadav (Pno-842356206) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench