DURGESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY LKO. AND ANOTHER
/13859/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178537 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178537 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13859 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.Abhinav N. Trivedi,
learned counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for grant of pensionary benefits in light of
judgment rendered by Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. & others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516).
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Principal Secretary, Legislative Assembly, U.P., Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same, in light of Prem Singh (supra) and Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 731 of 2024, in case the aforesaid judgments are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 2, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Gupta, Ramchandra Gupta, Sonali Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinav Trivedi (Manish Mathur,J.) Durgesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Legislative Assembly Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench